Safety Law News for December 3, 2019

• In Wisconsin, school-based law enforcement officers are being trained to take immediate action to neutralize acts of school violence.  “Running toward the disturbance,” is the dominant theme of appropriate training nationwide.  This is what occurred in a recent incident at Waukesha South High School, preventing the student shooter from harming others.

• In Arizona, officials in Mesa are proposing a law that will place restrictions on vaping in public places.  Similar laws are already in place in the cities of Tempe, Tucson and Flagstaff.   The superintendents of the school districts serving Mesa are in favor of the law to help them fight the vaping epidemic among teenagers.

• In Georgia, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that a school resource officer did not use excessive force when breaking up a fight between students.  The court noted that the rules on excessive force “depend very much on the facts of each case.”  In this case, the court ruled that placing a student in a choke hold and carrying her to the office while the student was “squirming, wiggling, twisting, and turning to get away,” did not fall on the unconstitutional side of the line.  (Hines v. Jefferson)

• In Virginia, officials in Clarke County’s four public schools are making available naloxone at each of Clarke County’s four public schools in case a student or visitor ever needs it.

Safety Law News for November 26, 2019

• In Illinois, the Urbana City Council approved a resolution to increase the presence of school resource officers.  Previously, the school board approved new safety measures with the city to have a full-time officer at the middle school and high school.  The change is in response to a fight in February at the High School which resulted in several students being sent to jail and one teacher hospitalized with injuries.  Some community members are opposed to the new safety measures.

• In Georgia, officers from the Floyd County Sheriff’s Office are making good use of police dogs in maintaining safer communities and schools.  The two canines have sniffed out contraband totaling over $2 million dollars in 2019.  In the schools, the dogs conduct random checks around the physical plant, classroom searches, and parking lot sniffs.

• In Indiana, school officials in Frankton are implementing a clear backpack policy after a bomb threat earlier this year forced the evacuation of a school.  Students must also keep the bags in their locker until school gets out.

• In Illinois, the Illinois Association of School Boards rejected a proposal to allow schools to arm teachers and staff at schools. The policy proposal was revisited after small rural schools asked for the option to provide better protection for their campuses because of the long response times when violence threatens their schools.

Safety Law News for November 22, 2019

• In Illinois, local school districts and the Illinois Association of School Boards are revisiting the proposal to allow schools to arm teachers and staff at schools.  Educators are having a change of heart on the issue in sympathy with small rural school districts that cannot afford to hire school resource officers but face long response times when violence threatens their schools.

• In Connecticut, parents of students in the Greenwich Public Schools are demanding more attention be given to campus safety.  A recent spate of incidents, including kids getting hit by cars in crosswalks, inconsistent screening of visitors who ring the doorbell at a school, and outdated infrastructure in the buildings, is giving rise to the concerns.

• In Ohio, the Canfield Police Department released a report, detailing more than 20 incidents in which they say the school district failed to notify a school resource officer about potential issues when they arose.  The incidents include assaults, weapons, and altercations between students and faculty members.

• In Arizona, State Representative Jay Lawrence criticized the state superintendent for supporting the use of newly approved school safety funds on mostly counselors and social workers rather than armed guards.

Safety Law News for November 19, 2019

• In Texas, educators in McLennan County are installing devices that detect when students are vaping on campus.  The devices, called Halo Smart Sensors, are in restrooms and other common areas.  If the sensors go off, a notification is sent to administrators’ cellphones.

• In Tennessee, the state education commissioner says the law enforcement presence in schools is increasing as a result of funding grants totaling $7.2 million.  Over 1300 school resource officers have been trained and deployed in schools. But 450 schools still lack a school resource officer. 

• In Massachusetts, officials for the Dracut Public School District are implementing a new anonymous reporting system for the mental health of their students.  Students can post anonymously through a hotline, website or mobile app. The responses are routed to a team of mental health professionals. 

• In Washington D.C., the Secret Service released a report on school safety.  The study concludes that most of the violent attacks in schools over the past decade were committed by students who telegraphed their intentions beforehand—and could have been prevented.  The Report recommends the use of behavioral threat assessments.

Safety Law News for November 14, 2019

• In Texas, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a free speech suit filed by a cheerleader who was removed from her cheerleading squad due to her off-campus social media activity.  The cheerleading coaches discovered a series of posts on her personal Twitter account containing profanity and sexual innuendo. The ruling allowed school officials to enforce their more rigorous conduct rules for participation in an extra-curricular activity.  (Longoria Next Friend of M.L. v. San Benito Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist)

• In New York, the New York Supreme Court ruled that school officials were not liable for a student’s death by suicide on the basis of the allegation that the educators failed to act to stop bullying.  The court reasoned that the duty of care exists in loco parentis but operates within the limited zone of an educator’s physical custody of and control over a student.  The student’s death occurred after school hours and off school premises, where district had no control over student, and there was no allegation that school officials were on notice of possibility of student’s suicide. (Collazo v. Hicksville Union Free School District)

• In Maine, officials in the City of Portland are seeking a revision in the agreement with local police to prevent school resource officers from wearing body cameras.  The school board voted unanimously to remove body cameras based on the belief that they erode the right to privacy of students.  Police officials do not agree with the decision.

• In North Carolina, Pitt County is the 14th county in the state to adopt the School Justice Partnership. SJP is an initiative managed by the North Carolina Judicial Branch’s Administrative Office of the Courts.  Its goal is to reduce the number of juvenile referrals to the court system through collaboration by school resource officers, school officials and representatives of the courts.

Safety Law News for November 8, 2019

• In Colorado, the Durango School District 9-R board has decided not to arm school security guards with firearms after months of heated community debate.  The district’s announcement followed a survey.  The survey showed the community supporting arming school security guards 51.7% to 48.3%. The survey explained that security guards would be former police officers who would be highly trained in firearm use.

• In California, in a five to two vote, board members of the Sacramento City Unified School District finalized the decision to reduce the number of police on campus.  The district is experimenting with new models for school safety and law enforcement’s role on its campuses.

• In Virginia, the Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of a student for violating gang-free school zone laws.  The student argued that Miranda warnings were required when he was questioned by his assistant principal and two officers six months prior to the incident that led to his arrest.  The court ruled that “[p]olice officers are not required to administer Miranda warnings to everyone whom they question.” The court applied the following factors and held that the student was not in custody.  (1) the manner in which the individual was summoned by the police, (2) the familiarity or neutrality of the surroundings, (3) the number of officers present, (4) the degree of physical restraint, (5) the duration and character of the interrogation, and (6) the extent to which the officers’ beliefs concerning the potential culpability of the individual being questioned were manifested to the individual.  (Melvin Yovany Argueta-Diaz v. Commonwealth of Virginia)

• In Illinois, the Appellate Court of Illinois affirmed the decision of the Board of Education of the City of Chicago to fire without a written warning a tenured teacher for striking a ten-year-old student in the face.  The court ruled that the use of force far exceeded the scope of any reasonable force necessary to maintain safety and discipline inside the school. (Don Huddleston v. Illinois State Board of Education)