Uncategorized

Safety Law News for October 27, 2023

by  • 

— In California, the California Court of Appeal denied immunity to a school district for injuries to a student who made her way to school by other means when the school bus “had not arrived for 40 minutes after the scheduled time.”  The student “got picked up from the bus stop by a friend whom she had texted. During their ride to school, the friend’s car was hit head on by another driver, causing (the student) to suffer fatal injuries.”  The court reversed the dismissal of the lawsuit by the trial court.  First, although California law declares schools are immune when students are not on school property (Cal. Educ. Code § 44808), “once a school district undertakes to provide transportation for its pupils, it has a duty to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances.”  The appellate court ruled that this exception to the off-campus immunity statute requires reversal, allowing the case to go forward.  Brinsmead v. Elk Grove Unified School District

— In Georgia, the Lieutenant Governor is proposing paying teachers “who hold a firearms training certificate an annual stipend.”  He wants to pay teachers $10,000 a year to encourage them to carry guns in schools.

— In Pennsylvania, the Senate Education Committee approved legislation that would mandate a “trained, armed school police, school resource or school security officer to be in every school building during school hours.” A state-wide poll “found 69 percent of voters favor requiring school districts to put an armed officer in every school. Additionally, 73 percent say they believe it would make schools safer.”

— In Colorado, the MOU between the Denver schools and the police department “outlines what the officers should and should not do.”  As one of the conditions for the officers returning to the schools, the agreement specifies that “officers should differentiate between disciplinary issues and crime problems and respond appropriately, and should not store guns inside schools.”

Uncategorized

Safety Law News for October 24, 2023

by  • 

— In Pennsylvania the United States District Court ruled that the provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) were not violated by keeping a student in an interim alternative education setting beyond the forty-five (45) day limit without a hearing.  The special needs student “brought a three-inch pocketknife to school and was displaying the knife to other students.”  A manifestation determination meeting ruled that it was not a manifestation of his disability nor “caused by the Local Educational Agency’s (LEA’s) failure to implement the IEP.”  Educators placed the student in an “interim alternative educational setting for forty-five (45) days due to the weapons violation,” and later agreed with his grandparents to delay his “return to the District high school (until) the beginning of the second marking period, thereby extending the 45-day placement.”  Soon thereafter, the student sent an email threatening to “ shoot up the school and die” and killed a named school official.  The manifestation determination again ruled that this incident was not a manifestation of his disability.  The student was expelled for the school year.  The Administrative Hearing Officer concluded that the District had not denied the student his IDEA rights.  On appeal, the court ruled that, “review of a hearing officer’s decision in an IDEA case is subject to a unique standard of review…(in which) findings of fact … are to be considered prima facie correct…and no deference is given to the hearing officer’s legal holdings.”  The court ruled that ‘the determination of whether a change in a child’s educational routine is a “change in placement” is a fact-specific one.”  Therefore, “based on the evidence, a reasonable fact finder could not conclude that the extension of the interim placement constituted a “change in placement.”  Jordan L. v. East Stroudsburg Area School District

— In Indiana, the Governor approved The Secured School Safety Grant a nearly $30 million grant to enhance Indiana school security.  The funding is “allocated in various categories, two-thirds of which went to increasing the number of school resources and law enforcement officers within local school systems.”

— In Kentucky, the Kentucky School Security Marshal says schools fall short in providing both resource officers, and mental health counselors.  The Task Force on School and Campus Safety found that “the main culprits for not having assigned SRO, majority of course was funding and personnel.”

— In Arizona, the Superintendent of Public Instruction is entering into an agreement with private a company to address staffing shortages that is making filling school resource officer positions difficult. Arizona law provides millions of dollars in grants for schools to hire school resource officers, as well as counselors and social workers.  As to officers, “when they went to hire someone, they found out that the police departments couldn’t spare enough people to fill those positions.”

Uncategorized

Safety Law News for October 19, 2023

by  • 

— In Maryland the United States District Court denied qualified immunity to a school administrator accused by a parent of failing to protect her child.  The “six-year-old public school student (was) in the first grade …when she was sexually abused by two female classmates.”  The court held that, (t)he harm of sexual harassment consists not only of specific acts, but also the hostile “environment” or “atmosphere” these acts create.”  Qualified immunity was inappropriate because the allegations showed that, “after (the student) was abused on five separate occasions in her classroom, (the administrator) knew what occurred, yet allowed (the student)  to remain in the same class as her abusers, and failed to protect (the student)  from further sexual abuse or…separate her from the other female classmates who abused her.  The court ruled that “the law clearly established that a school administrator has a duty to ameliorate such an environment. Therefore, it is not appropriate to grant (the administrator) qualified immunity with respect to plaintiff’s equal protection claim.”  Latisha Robinson v. Board of Education of Washington County

–In Arizona, officials in the Arizona Department of Education have approved a policy authorizing schools to fill vacant school resource officer positions with off-duty police officers.  The officers “will receive less training than traditional school resource officers, who typically get 40 hours of training. School safety officers will take eight hours of asynchronous training on things unique to the school environment.”

— In Minnesota, an investigation reveals that the incidence of guns in schools is increasing.

“Schools are required to report to the Minnesota Department of Education when a weapon is found on the property.”  The data show that “70 handgun or long guns were confiscated in schools during the 2021-22 school year. That is more than double the highest previous total and three times the 22 guns recovered during 2018-19 – the last full year before the pandemic kept many kids out of the classroom…In Minneapolis Public Schools alone, 30 guns were recovered during 2021-22, a significant increase over the four previous years combined.”

— In Arkansas, officials in the Pangburn School District are replacing more than 100 door locks and handles in three of the district’s oldest buildings.  Officials discovered that some buildings “still have the original locking mechanisms and different keys for every door.”  The upgrade is part of a comprehensive revision of the safety plan that includes, “ID badge card reader system… maglocks and ID scanners… a new Tiger tip line…(and) staff members (who) carry concealed firearms on campus.”

Uncategorized

Safety Law News for October 13, 2023

by  • 

— In New Jersey, the United States District Court, dismissed a lawsuit filed by a student who refused to comply with the Bag Policy.  The Bag Policy, in pertinent part states, “All students are permitted to carry clear book bags only. Purses and oversized bags are not permitted. Students may carry electronic device(s) in a small sleeve/protective cover, a water bottle, book(s)/notebook(s) and a small purse.”  In dismissing the lawsuit, the court ruled that, “it is well-established that “students within the school environment have a lesser expectation of privacy than members of the population generally… Furthermore, courts around the country give great deference to school officials in effectuating policies and procedures to protect student safety…. Requiring all students who choose to use a backpack to use a translucent one while at school appears clearly within the school district’s discretion in an effort to ensure and promote school safety.”  Krasil v. Betze

–In New York, the Buffalo School Board President called a special school board meeting requesting the Superintendent to provide an update on school safety.  The request comes after incidents in which violence canceled a football game, victimized an employee and a student during the school day, and the arrest of a person who sparred with several students on the lawn outside a school.

— In Indiana, the Scott County Sheriff’s Office is determining whether to remove school resource officers and deploy them on patrol because of funding and staff shortages.  The issue is arising because, “deputies are leaving the county to work for other departments in Indiana that are offering thousands more dollars in wages.”

— In Oklahoma, Bartlesville Police will get ballistic shields for its school resource officers, thanks to a $5,000 donation from a local auto dealer.  The ballistic shields can be used to help protect both officers and students if an active shooter were to come onto campus.

Uncategorized

Safety Law News for September 29, 2023

by  • 

— In New York, the Supreme Court Appellate Division, affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a student who claimed that he “was assaulted, harassed, and subjected to bullying by other students during an incident that occurred while (he) was attending an overnight school trip.”  The applicable rule is that, “(s)chools have a duty to adequately supervise the students in their care, and may be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision.”  The appellate court agreed with the trial court that when asserting a claim, the student must show “(a)ctual or constructive notice to the school of prior similar conduct,” that puts on notice the school that the misconduct is foreseeable.  The educators “had no actual or constructive notice of prior conduct by the students allegedly involved herein that was similar to the subject incident.”  Burdo v. Cold Spring Harbor Central School District

— In Kentucky, officials in Lincoln County are renewing efforts to deploy officers onto its school campuses after a threat caused the lockdown of a high school and a middle school.  They are discussing the possibility of “filling the state-wide SRO shortage by hiring active duty and retired National Guard and military personnel.”

— In Alabama, the Mobile County School Board is constrained in placing officers in all of its schools because it does not enough officers certified through the Alabama Peace Officer Standards.  Only three officers are trained.  Additional officers will be deployed “as they become available.”

— In Missouri, officials in the Grandview R-2 School District are considering arming teachers and administrators.  State law provides that school boards can arm teachers and administrators on school property so they can respond to active shooter situations.  The community is being invited to a public hearing to share their views.

Uncategorized

Safety Law News for September 26, 2023

by  • 

— In Illinois, the United States District Court dismissed a case brought by parents of a middle school student who was searched by the school principal in the presence of police officers and “found no contraband.”  School employees reported seeing a transfer of money between the student and a fellow student and removed him from class, searching his person and his bookbag.  When nothing was found, the student “was allowed to return to his class, and he was not disciplined in any way.”  Parents sued, arguing that, “he was embarrassed and humiliated by being removed from the classroom in front of his classmates,” and searched for an improper reason that violated his Fourth Amendment rights.  The court ruled that the constitutionality of a student search relies on reasonable suspicion, e.g., whether the “student’s conduct creates a reasonable suspicion that a particular regulation or law has been violated, with the search serving to produce evidence of that violation.”  The court held that the search by the principal, “was reasonably related in scope to locate contraband and was not excessively intrusive.”  Finally, the court ruled that no cases would “put a reasonable principal on notice that it was unconstitutional to conduct a search … after a student gives money to another student during school.”  Jedliska v. Snow

— In Texas, the Austin ISD Board of Trustees are deploying one AISD police officer at each of the district’s schools.  “The recommendation also stated there should be administrative discretion for assigning additional officers based on the size of the campus and the needs of the campus and surrounding vicinity.”

— In Washington State, the Olympia School District is reestablishing its relationship with the Olympia Police Department, reinstating the School Resource Officers (SROs) on campuses after guns were brought to its high school twice in the first week of school.  The school board objective is “to adopt a policy that establishes a formal, collaborative relationship with the Public Safety Division of the City of Olympia, not simply puts police in schools.” The board is discussing placing an emphasis “on a holistic approach, including consultation, multi-tiered support systems, crisis response unit members, and uniformed officers.”

— In North Carolina, the Wake County School District is forming a Coalition for Safer Schools to improve threat assessments in the wake of increasing threats that trigger lockdowns of its schools.  “School threats are increasing at an alarming rate and there’s a need for more coordinated effort among law enforcement.”